Sunday 29 January 2012

Video Sunday - Je Suis En Retard

Uploaded: 25/1/12
Running Time: 1:56
Views When Found (26/1): 390,775
Views When Posted Today: 5,401,438

[Don't worry, "Je suis en retard" means "I am late". I'm not questioning anyone's mental strength]

As you must surely own an Internet (otherwise how are you reading this?), you have probably become aware of the phrase "trolling", which refers to someone winding people up on internet forums/comment sections or posting something designed to get an indignant response, perhaps from someone whose mental strength is roughly on par with YouTube commenters (seriously, don't read them below the Top Rated ones). Well, Rémi Galliard is what you might consider a "Troll IRL", as he likes to annoy the French police in many imaginative and ridiculous ways, as well as moody security guards and golfers from time to time. Here, he's making sure that even the people who are running late, be they travelling by road, rail or air, is sticking to the speed limit. A noble undertaking if you ask me. Unfortunately, the Gendarms aren't quite on the same wavelength when they find him at the end. Well, wouldn't you be annoyed if you were caught speeding in a police van?

If you try this at home, please film it.

Saturday 28 January 2012

Video Saturday - Beats an EZGO

Uploaded: 18/1/12
Running Time: 2:08
Views When Posted: 99,221

Unless you've been tricked into the relentless and fruitless pursuit of perfection that is playing the sport, golf is dull. Sure, taking a few swings at the driving range can be pretty fun, but on TV it's mostly men who've waved 30 goodbye standing on cleanly-mowed fields in beige trousers looking at a flag. To spice things up, New Zealander Rhys Millen, son of Pikes Peak legend and IMSA racer Rod Millen, has taken his 500-horsepower Hyundai Veloster rallycross car and gone all Ken Block on us, acting as caddy for what can only be described as "A Man". He then helps A Man score a goal-in-one by parking in the right spot on the green (although surely it's all green?) and heading it in with his Veloster RC. Because it's a little short, the video makers have even thrown in a little "Making Of" at the end, just to allay any conspiracies of fakery. In that there definitely is fakery. Hopefully you enjoyed this video before reading this last bit, so I didn't just ruin it for you.

Thursday 26 January 2012

Video Thursday - The Only Hybrid You Should Listen To

Uploaded: 25/1/12
Running Time: 59secs
Views When Posted: 10,800

The other day I did a post on the new Toyota TS030 HYBRID looking to take on Audi at this year's Le Mans 24 Hours. Now you can listen to what that hybrid system sounds like. As well as gathering up to 500kJ of electrical energy to release above 75mph, the Toyota Hybrid you should actually care about will apparently use its electric motor (which, looking at the DENSO sponsor on the side, is probably rear-mounted) to taxi down the pit lane, thus saving extra fuel with each stop. Well, you know what Tesco say...

Wednesday 25 January 2012

SAAB's Entire History Is Secure. I'm Glaad

2011 SAAB Phoenix Concept
This is just a quick post to say that, after getting all sad that the SAAB museum was for sale, the City of Trollhättan , SAAB AB and The Wallenburg Foundation have all pitched in to save the collection of 123 cars and keep them all in one place, in the museum in SAAB's town of birth, which clearly cares enough about its history to preserve it. Woo!

To celebrate, here's some stunt driving. It's grainy, but there are some pretty good tricks, plus it's a Spa-Francorchamps. What more can you ask for?! Oh yeah, SAAB not dying in the first place. Er, apart from that, what more could you ask for?! Enjoy!

Uploaded: 27/5/07
Running Time: 1:58
Views When Posted: 2023

Forget The Prius GT300, THIS Is The Only Hybrid You Should Care About

2012 Toyota TS030 at the Paul Ricard Circuit
Wow, Toyota are really keen to get rid of their dull image. First they co-produce the GTBRZ86-RS coupé with Subaru, then they make a Prius to enter the GT300 class of SUPER GT, and now we have here their first Le Mans entry since 1999 (around the last time they were this awesome), the TS030. Sure, it's a hybrid, but it's in the Porsche/Williams flywheel-accumulator-cum-KERS kind of way, not the barely-moving Auris HSD kind of way. Toyota, if all goes well come mid-June, you will be one step closer to reclaiming your long-lost awesomeness. Especially as Peugeot have bowed out...

Actually, let's start with the Frenchies first before I continue with Toyota. Peugeot have officially pulled out of prototype racing after a five-year tussle with Audi for the all-important win at Le Mans - which it achieved in 2009 - and the new Intercontinental Le Mans Cup, which it won for the first time last year. Apparently, "This decision has been taken in the context of a difficult economic environment in Europe," according to an official statement. "Peugeot has chosen to concentrate resources on its sales performance in 2012." Bummer. The new 208 had better be good...

Look at those eyes. You couldn't stay mad at it.
While Peugeot focuses on selling hatchbacks and saloons, Toyota is now focusing on their new racing car. Funny how things change. The TS030 is powered by a 3.4-litre V8 (perhaps the same one it uses in its GT500 Lexus SC430, as engine size in SUPER GT is capped at 3400cc, and that would just make sense), which is aided by a new hybrid system imaginatively called Toyota Hybrid System - Racing (THS-R). Little is known about the system at this point, but LMP rules state that the electrical energy it saves up (with a maximum of 500kJ) can only be released through two wheels (or one axle). Another regulation says that, were it to be released through the front wheels, it can only do so "above 120km/h [~75mph]", so as not to give this layout any traction advantages out of corners, particularly slow ones. That's why All-Wheel-Drive systems are banned in most motorsports, after cars like the Nissan Skyline GT-R dominated globally with AWD. Toyota are currently reviewing two hybrid systems, a front-motor system produced by Aisin AW, and a rear-motor system developed by DENSO, who have run a Toyota SUPER GT team for years.

Behind those puppy-dog eyes, the body is very reminiscent of the Audi R18 TDI that won the LM24 last year (although it wasn't an easy race), which one could argue is slightly derivative, but then if you're making a new LMP1 car from scratch, the 24 Hours winner isn't exactly a bad source of inspiration. Besides, with diesel still being the faster engine, perhaps using similar aerodynamics will help put the rookie TS030 in range of the soul remaining oil-burner. Without Peugeot bothering them, Audi could walk it this year if the new rules hindering progress aren't enough to stop them claiming their 11th Le Mans win in 14 years. Being a new car, the TS030 isn't realistically in with a shot of winning, but with a proven engine (if I'm right about it being the GT500 engine) and, ahem, proven aerodynamics, who knows? Maybe it could be in with a shot of scoring some decent finishes. Hybrid versus diesel? You wouldn't have expected that to be a real contest in endurance racing 5 or 10 years ago, yet here we are. Maybe in 5 or 10 years' time, it'll be diesel hybrids versus hydrogen. You never know. Its first race is the 6 Hours of Spa, held on the 5th May at, er, Spa.

That's all I can really think to say about this car, except for that name. TS030 may sound as boring as any other prototype racing car name (908 HDI, R18 TDI, AMR-One, ARX-01, B11/40, the list goes on), but actually there's a degree of nostalgia in there. TS stands for Toyota Sport, but the '030' is carrying on from the last 20 years. Kind of:

Note how similar the paint job is to the TS030.
1992 Toyota TS010 (Group C)

The first car to use this name layout was the TS010 (always good to start with a one), entered in the World Sportscar Championship in 1992. This followed major changes in the series, which meant they had to retire the ##C-V car (GT5'ers will be aware of the Minolta-sponsored 88C-V) for this new chassis, built to take the new regulation 3.5-litre V10 which replaced the 3.6 V8TT they were using. It actually debuted in late 1991 (about a month before I did) at a Japanese track called Autopolis, finishing 6th. When it raced for reals in '92, it won the first race of the WSC season at a very wet Monza, after the lead Peugeot crashed out (spooky). Alas, that was its only win that year. At Le Mans, it also did very well, setting the fastest lap of the race and hitting the highest speed in the race as well, although this time the lead Peugeot made it to the end, meaning the lead TS010 came in 2nd, six laps behind, with the other finishing 8th. The rest of the year wasn't great, with reliability problems taking both cars out in the second round (as well as one of them in rounds 4 and 5). They always finished behind one or two Peugeots. In 1993, the WSC was cancelled after manufacturers lost interest following a shaky '92 season, leaving only Le Mans left for the car to enter. Enter they did, with three specially-made new cars. Eddie Irvine and company brought their TS010 home in 4th place, behind a trio of dominating Peugeots. Perhaps Toyota can manage the same result this year behind the Audis? Anything can happen...

1998 Toyota TS020 "GT-One" (GT1/GTP)

In 1994, Toyota decided to change tact and switch to GT racing, with a heavily modified Supra LM and a heavily modified MR2 using a new 600-horsepower 4.0 V8 Twin-Turbo, which became the SARD MC8. After the SARD car proved itself superior to the Supra, Toyota decided to skip 1997 and spend the year developing a pure-bred bespoke racing car for the GT1 class. That year, the Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR and Porsche 911 GT1 appeared, fearsome loophole-exploiting cars that dominated the FIA GT Championship (which arose from the ashes of Group C via IMSA in America). These were bespoke cars, with a tiny number sold as road cars to homologate them and officially call them "production-based". Toyota found they only needed two road cars to pass this rule, which they didn't technically sell to anyone, as they both live in Toyota museums. After discovering that Mercedes exposed the loophole of all GT cars having to be able to hold a standard-sized suitcase by putting a useless cubby hole somewhere in the back, Toyota were somehow able to convince ACO officials that the empty fuel tank counted, because technically it could hold a suitcase. It sounds silly, but hey, it worked, and so the TS020 was born in 1998, featuring an updated version of the old ##C-V's 3.6-litre V8TT. 600 horsepower propelled a 900kg bespoke racer to speeds of up to 236mph, and the slippery aerodynamic body (featuring a front diffuser) meant it wasn't nearly as scary as doing the same speeds or more in a lift-producing Porsche 917K. The GT-One, as it became known, looked utterly fantastic, but while it was no slouch, it ultimately went without a win during its two-year career.

Its debut race was the 1998 LM24, and despite qualifying 2nd, as well as 7th and 8th, it didn't go well. Halfway through the race, car #28 suffered a high-speed crash. After that, #29 had a gearbox failure and had to retire from 2nd place, leaving #27 to finish a dismal 9th, 25 laps behind the dominant Porsche 911 GT1. Because these GT1 cars were so fast they actually out-raced the supposedly-faster LMP cars (the fastest of which only managed 8th that year), the FIA closed the loopholes in GT1 and made the GTP class for cars like the GT-One. Porsche left in '99 to make room for Audi, and Mercedes-Benz turned the CLK GTR into the CLR, which, as it turned out, had a habit of back-flipping into the air at very high speed as it went over a crest on the Mulsanne straight, causing them to pull out mid-race before someone was killed. Did this leave Toyota with a clear shot at a win? Well, er, no. While they were fastest in testing at Spa, as well as qualifying 1st, 2nd and 8th at le Mans, the front wheel wells were designed with aerodynamic purposes, and the way they were designed meant that front punctures were fatal (to the car, not drivers). This was because debris and sharp gravel could get into places it shouldn't, which happened twice in the race, one instance of which left a car destroyed after a big accident. The lone car fought against the Williams-BMW V12 LMR through the night, but it too finally suffered a puncture, although it wasn't fatal this time. The lone #3 car had to crawl back to the pits and went on to finish a lap behind the BMW, in 2nd place. After that its only other race was the Fuji 1000KM, in which it was a lap behind the Nissan R391, in 2nd place. It was beautiful, it was devastatingly fast, but it had an Achilles heel, which tripped it up time and again. After 1999, Toyota pulled out and started putting together and equally unsuccessful Formula 1 team, racing from 2002-2009.

2012 Toyota TS030 HYBRID (LMP1)

After running and engine in a Lola LMP1 chassis last year, Toyota are entering a factory-backed car in the top class. The rest is as you read earlier. Many of Toyotas failings during races have been down to reliability, which given the reputation of their road cars seems unusual. Perhaps they can get over this perennial issue this year, as we not only live in a world of bulletproof Toyotas, but of Le Mans Prototype cars that can race flat-out for 24 hours without engine failures or flipping over or anything. Well, some of them can. Aston Martin's car was crap last year. As a new car taking on an evolved version of a winner, it seems doubtful that it could overthrow the R18 TDI, but if all goes well, a podium finish isn't out of the question, if history tells us anything...

Tuesday 24 January 2012

Chevrolet Corvette C7 Spied Wearing A Snow Jacket


As a follow-up to the renderings (and my subsequent slap-dash modifications) of the C7-generation Corvette, here are spy shots of the first C7-bodied prototypes getting their chill on in Northern Europe for cold-weather endurance testing. Temperatures there are estimated to be at around -20°C, so will this ensure the next Corvette will be a cool car? Someone should probably tell them it doesn't quite work that way...

Looking pretty similar to a C6 in its overall shape, it's the details that will set this car apart from the old car. Despite not being able to see the details, Jalopnik are claiming to be 100% right about everything, as showcased in this infantile brag-fest of a post. What do you want, a fucking medal? It looks Corvette-shaped. Well done. Get over yourself and let people make their own minds up, for crying out loud...

Anyway, here are a couple more shots if you don't want to use up more of your work day clicking links:

The bonnet is longer than the old car, suggesting anything from a bigger engine to more legroom or simply improved aerodynamics.
Four horns make a great-sounding quartet.
 They pretty much sum up what you can see. No more details have come out since my last post, so I can still only tell you that will have some kind of V8 and probably a 7-speed manual like a Porsche 911 (991).

Saturday 21 January 2012

Video Saturday - Epic Win

Uploaded: 16/1/12
Running Time: 3:03
Views When Posted: 1,405,031

When a YouTube video has reached nearly 1.5 million views in five days, you know it must be good. Unless it's a new Rebecca Black song, then you know it's laughably horrid. Either way, this definitely is worth watching, as motoring and football mix together to make one heck of a good shot. I don't know who this guy is, other than being called Nakamura, which is a bit like being called Jones when you're in Japan. Anyway, Mr. Jones has to kick a football through the window of a moving bus, and, well, I'll let you watch it first.


So, seen it now? How cool is that?! It's not just that it worked, it's that it was right in the middle. There's no arguing with that! One question does enter my mind, though - why does every Japanese TV clip have a window with someone watching it in the corner? Are they all from the same show, which appears to be about impressing judges? I don't know. I do know that that's one epic goal.

Friday 20 January 2012

Special Stage Route X - A Guide Through Polyphony's Ehra-Lessien

It's not every track where turns 1 and 2 are over 10KM apart
This month, Gran Turismo 5 received another update to Spec 2.03. This included some new cars, none of which is an R35 GT-R (finally) and one of which will be appearing here in the next couple of days, and a new circuit, Special Stage Route X. While all the other SS routes in the GT universe are on fictional Tokyo streets, this one is literally in the middle of nowhere, and makes no bones about what it is: a pure speed circuit. Of course, the natural thing to do when you get this track is race a grid of Bugatti Veyrons on it, so I did just that and took plenty of pictures afterwards, so any non-GT5ers reading SBV8 won't miss out. On that note, did you know that this track makes a brief appearance in the Spec 2.0 intro video? Just before McLaren MP4-12Cs are seen slo-mo drifting around turn 3 of London, you can see the Red Bull X2011 covering ground at a serious rate of knots over the distance markers. True story. Anyway, let's look inside Polyphony Digital's very own Ehra-Lessien...

Layout
I would guide you round the lap one corner at a time, but the layout is actually very simple, simpler even than the real Ehra-Lessien. Two straights more than 10,000m long are bookended by huge banked corners. A Bugatti Veyron on a solo flying lap doesn't drop below 240mph on here, and you can't see the end of the flat back straight even from the middle, because of the curvature of the Earth. You can't see all the way down the main straight either, but that's because of the curvature of the road (vertically).

Of course, the long straights mean that the replay cameras can be inventive. Cameras that look like they're attached to planes, cameras running along the barriers at incredible speed, all kinds of stuff. I was expecting such, and I wasn't disappointed. To show you, I managed to capture a videograph on my telephone. Unfortunately as I don't have a video capture thing and there's no upload function (replay files are just small data files for the game to read and turn into a replay, rather than proper video files), I had to film my TV, so apologies that it looks over-exposed.

Uploaded: 20/1/12
Running Time: 5:39
Views When Posted: 1

Pretty cool, huh?

Photo Guide
For a more detailed look at various bits of the track, I think in-game photographs are probably best, as they'll look better and more detailed that the above video.

You start in this peculiar hangar tunnel thing...
...and 3KM later,you start climbing towards a rising sun. It looks like an ascent into heaven, especially from the cockpit of a McLaren F1.
What goes up must come down, as you accumulate a few extra MPH and fly past a cargo ship...
...after which you scythe through a small canyon on the edge of the mysterious island...
...and into Turn 1.
How high up the banking dare you go? I got roughly a wheel's width away from the yellow line at one point.
Once you level out, it's time to cover another 10KM, plus the distance from the yellow line to the 0KM gantry.
The back straight is used in a new Speed Test feature added in the update, which measures 0-60mph, 0-100mph, standing 1/4-mile and a standing mile. So far only the Suzuki Escudo Pikes Peak has posted a faster 0-100 time than the big white Bug.
Just before you reach 7KM, a tunnel appears.
The exit to the tunnel looks similar to that of the old Test Track from GT3 and 4, which was run in the opposite direction to this.
This is new, however. It's a field of satellite dishes. Interesting...
After 10KM and a little bit more, it's time for a corner. Remember those? They're kinda... round, compared to the last 11KM...
Actually, I've touched the line, it seems.
A nice long corner later, it's back at the start. Where does number 03 go? We may never know...
So it's a simple layout, but in a seriously fast car it's pretty cool. In a Nissan Leaf? I won't lie, it's pretty bloody dull, although that's nothing compared to a VW Beetle 1200, with its top speed of 75mph...

Most useful is the Speed Test function, as you can now directly compare your favourite cars, and see if you can get a RWD car to launch cleanly while still setting the fastest time, something I have thus far failed to manage...

Tuesday 17 January 2012

SAAB's Entire History Is For Sale. How Saad.

SAAB Sonnet on the left, one of very few MF-layout cars
As I'm sure you know from the horribly drawn-out and very public fall to bankruptcy, SAAB has gone bust. The weird and wonderful Swedish company lost it all, lest we forget, because a saving bid was blocked by General Motors, who didn't want the parts and platforms they were supplying to go to the Chinese operation that were interested in buying them. Damn you, GM. SAAB are cool. Secretly. Anyway, as part of the divorce, the Swedish bank has custody of the SAAB museum, featuring every significant model in the company's history, and much more besides, and they've just put it on sale. And so the saad ending of SAAB continues....

A SAAB museum is definitely a museum I would visit, were it not in Trollhättan in Sweden, where the company is based. As the picture above shows, you've got the very aerodynamic-looking early models with their peculiar two-stroke engines and V4s, the 600kg Sonnett roadster and the later coupés, the first of which was unusual in its mid-engined, front-wheel-drive layout (although the engine was still ahead of the cockpit), right up to the almost-present day stuff, eventually including the only surviving prototype of the 9-5 Estate, after SAAB crushes its last 100 cars as part of the receivership process. In-between those extremes, there are the tiny estate versions, the first car ever to have seatbelts, the first turbocharged family cars ever (and the first car to use a low-pressure turbo), the first cars to have a 16-valve engine, impact bumpers, split-field door mirrors (a bit like bifocal glasses, reducing blind spots), cabin pollen filters, rear passenger protection, ventilated front seats, CFC-free air con, active head restraints to lessen whiplash, Electronic Brake-force Distribution (EBD), the list goes on and on and on. Wikipedia lists a total of 28 items in the Innovations section of its article on SAAB Automobile, some of which (asbestos-free brake pads, for instance) are pretty important. A signature of all but two SAABs is a floor-mounted ignition column, which means that the driver's knee won't sustain any serious injury in a collision from ramming into the key. How considerate.

Alongside the cars, one of which is the original 1946 Ursaab, there are a few planes as well, as it is an important part of SAAB's history. Ten years before the Ursaab, they were an aerospace and defence company, and that part of SAAB is still around (only the car company went bust). Highlights of those include the curiously attractive supersonic 35 Draken, which was in service for 19 years from 1955, and the 37 Viggen (Swedish for Thunderbolt), which served as a short-medium range fighter jet for 20 years, starting in 1970. I don't know how many planes are in the museum, but there's at least one on the top picture. For a long time, the car company played on the idea that to own a SAAB was to own a jet fighter with wheels, and certainly the chances were good that it was powered in part by a turbine, assuming it's a 1978 99 Turbo or newer. Other highlights include friction testers with a fifth wheel in the boot that would scream down the runways of airports to tell aeroplanes how to adjust their braking distances and such, which works thusly:

A fifth wheel is mounted in the boot, connected to the rear wheels via a chain-drive. This wheel is deployed with about 300lb of downward force once the car is at speed; a built-in 10-15% slip of the fifth wheel allows for constantly varying calculations of surface friction. Sensors in the car transmit readings to the towers in almost real-time, allowing for very accurate changes to aircraft braking requirements on demand.


Again, I don't know if one of those is in the museum, but considering they were used globally for a long time, there's every chance. As well as the numerous successful rally cars in their history up to the 1980s, there might also be a 9-2X, which is essentially a GD-generation Subaru Impreza WRX estate with a SAAB's face on it which, I think, is slightly better-looking. But then SAABs have always had an interesting look about them, with three- or four-spoke wheels when most go for five or more, the "hockey stick" C-pillar (introduced in the '70s when the teardrop shape was replaced), the headlights that taper steeply upwards at the ends, the dashboard that curves towards the driver "like a jet-fighter", the smooth shapes of the newer cars like the last 9-5, they certainly had their own look, and I liked it, especially on the Aero-X concept from 2006, which they really should've made...

Aero-X Concept
Innovation and quriky good looks aren't enough to make a living though, otherwise I might be in a financial position to revive SAAB in 5 or 10 years' time (kidding, I'm not actually that innovative). SAAB fell into financial trouble more than once, and weren't exactly in the money before then, either. General Motors bought half the company in 1989, and a year after it put the 900 on the same platform as the Opel/Vauxhall Vectra in 1994, SAAB posted a profit for the first time in seven years. Build quality suffered, though. For their 50th anniversary in 1997, they replaced the ancient 9000 with the 9-5 (starting the trend for dashes in model names). They bought the company entirely in 2000, and put the new 9-3 on the same platform, only with much more Vectra in it and less unique styling, replacing the sloping hatchback with a humdrum saloon shape. Just eight years later though, SAAB were in trouble again, being put "under review" in 2008 when the credit crunch hit GM so hard it went bankrupt and had to kill off Pontiac, Hummer and Saturn. The Swedish arm survived, but it wasn't looking good, even going into administration the next year. Also-Swedish maker of automotive lunatics Koenigsegg was *pinches finger and thumb* this close to buying them, until they realised that the agreement with a total of four groups of investors was too hard to work with and they couldn't go through with it...

In January 2010, Dutch supercar builders Spyker beat offers from Renault F1 owners Genii Capital and Merbanco (whoever they are) to buy them in 2010, but SAAB were not out of the woods yet. The deal included GM sending over engines and transmissions from America, as well as finished 9-4X crossovers from Mexico. As SAAB restarted production, they were looking up, with plans for a new 9-3 by this year, plans to re-enter the Chinese market after GM pulled them out in '08 and expectations to sell 50-55k vehicles from July to the end of the year. In October, they changed their expectations to 30-40k, eventually selling 31,696 vehicles in total that year.

By 2011, despite Spyker Cars N.V planning to sell the sports car arm and focus entirely on SAAB, including renaming themselves to match, there were unpaid invoices that lead to supplies to Trollhättan being halted and production stopping in early April. Production restarted seven weeks later, but only lasted for a fortnight, as owners fought desperately for emergency funding from Hawtai and other Chinese companies and didn't find any, a lack of funding even meaning that the entire 3800-person workforce went unpaid in June, until they were forced to pay them on penalty of forced liquidation by a trade union. More missed pay, more subsequent pressure from trade unions and more failures to secure proper funding meant that in just six months, SAAB posted a loss of €201.5m, with revenues of €359m. Debt built up, as did bad press.

In September '11, SAAB petitioned for bankruptcy protection for the second time in less than three years, the plan being to stay above water while the Chinese companies Pang Da and Zhejiang Youngman got government approval from their own government, which would've allowed them to buy SAAB and get going on making three new cars(including a new 9-3 and bringing back the old teardrop-shaped 92) that could potentially have helped them level out, alas SAAB were rejected because Sweden doubted their ability to get the money needed to continue (understandably). By now the trade unions had had enough and requested SAAB be put into liquidation and petitioned for bankruptcy supervision of the company. Then GM stepped back in, saying that they did not want their licenses to go to a Chinese company, as they would be feeding a rival in a key market they're entering. SAAB tried and tried to work around it, but GM cockblocked any deal with Chinese people, and with offers not coming from anywhere else in the world, that was that.

On the 19th December, with production firmly at a halt, SAAB filed for bankruptcy. They're allowed to come out of bankruptcy again, technically, but however you look at it, the quirky, experimental Swedish car company originally started in 1946 by keen engineers, died a complete mess with no USP left and no chance of securing its future thanks to General Motors, who were wholly responsible after dumbing them down in the '90s and blocking Chinese deals. It seems that, in the end, the bad guys won.

And so we come back to the museum. Having written all this, I'm actually starting to feel rather upset about it. There are 123 cars in the museum, which is now closed of course, and every single one of them is up for sale, including the one original urSAAB from 1946, as part of the liquidation/bankruptcy agreement (full car list here). Unless there's a very keen SAAB enthusiast with a couple of million to spend on the entire collection, these cars will be split up and scatter all over the world, which is incredibly sad. With a company like this, the one thing that should exist now they're gone is a collection of their history, all in one place, to tell the story and show the cool SAAB few remember to the world (or anyone prepared to go to Sweden). Instead, it will vanish, and you'll have to rely on the internet, and an apparent tribute in the next series of TopGear (starting Jan 29th). It's not right to kick them like that when they're down, but apparently that's the world we're in.

Goodbye SAAB. Sorry it didn't work out.


UPDATE: I have good news regarding the buyers!

Sunday 15 January 2012

Toyota's GT300 Entry Is the Only Hybrid You Should Care About

Can you tell what it is yet?
As well as the Subaru BRZ, this year's SUPER GT series is set to have a pretty damn awesome GT300 class, not only because of the usual mix of BMWs, Porsches, Ferraris, Nissan Zs, bespoke racers and so on, but because of Toyota's new entry, which started out in life as something you wouldn't expect to become a racing car...

You see, it's a Toyota Prius. No really, I mean it, this is a Toyota Prius racing car, with a racing engine and everything. You can check the date if you want, it's not the 1st of April. A racing team in Japan (perhaps even backed by Toyota) has decided to enter the pious hybrid into the GT300 class of the premier Japanese sports car series, SUPER GT. GT300 is the lower of the two classes, with the Nissan GT-R, Honda HSV-010 and maybe this year a Lexus LFA (replacing the old SC430) fighting it out in GT500. The number refers to horsepower, so what we have here is a 300-horsepower racing hybrid. Maybe it goes through the pit lane on electric power alone or something.

The regulations in SUPER GT allow for what's known as silhouette racers, meaning that the car is allowed to be on a bespoke chassis as long as it maintains the road car's "silhouette", or outline. So the roof and everything from the top of the wheels up has to resemble a road car. This means the Prius can retain its slippery roof line, which allows the road car to achieve a very low drag coefficient of 0.25. That could help it in a straight line compared to its rivals, which include Ferraris, Lamborghinis, Porsches, and of course the Subaru. Of course, the huge spoilers and dive planes and so on will add drag (as well as downforce), but being a silhouette racer, it's also significantly lower than a road car, and the Cd might still be lower than the aforementioned rivals. Because they're all limited to 300 horsepower, the Prius may even have a chance of beating them all. That would be weird. We'll have to wait and see. That said, the success bias applied to winners means that it is genuinely an even playing field, so there's every chance of a strong finish. In a Prius. Against Ferraris. Just another reason to love the weird and wonderful world of Japan.


The first round of SUPER GT will be, ironically, on the 1st April, at Okayama International Circuit (previously known as Aida). You can keep abreast of all things SUPER GT on their English website. I may even start reporting on it, but that's not a promise.

Video Sunday - In Soviet Russia, Drowning Escape You

Uploaded: 8/1/12
Running Time: 2:36
Views When Posted: 245,491

For a long time, it looks like this Kirovec K-701 isn't going to avoid its watery grave in the middle of what can only be described as A River. The huge Russian tractor-truck, which weighs 12.4 tonnes and only has 300 horsepower (but probably a huge torque figure) to help it, finally makes it out and into relatively dry land. With the air intake and exhaust staying relatively out of the water's way, chances are it continued working perfectly after taking an unwanted dip. What's surprising about this video is actually the amount of truck that resurfaces...

Enjoy a simple truck with an apparently simple-minded driver escaping using the Jeremy Clarkson Method, i.e. POWERRRRRRRR!!

Saturday 14 January 2012

Video Saturday - Gojira-San

Uploaded: 8/12/11
Running Time: 4:56
Views When Posted: 35,244

After giving you a few quotes from the man who co-created Godzilla (by which I mean the Nissan GT-R since 1989), and then rambling a bit afterwards, here is a video where Autocar's Steve Sutcliffe interviews him from behind the wheel of the new 2012 DBA-R35 GT-R. One point of interest is where he mentions that, while most car companies publish the highest power figure they got for a new model, Nissan quote the lowest for the GT-R, so even with the different variables between each engine build, a GT-R buyer is guaranteed to get at least the 542 horsepower quoted by Nissan that they're expecting. This perhaps confirms the suspicions of many that when the original CBA-R35 came out in 2007/8 and set amazing Nürburgring lap times, it was perhaps channelling more than the 473bhp through the four 20" wheels that Nissan was saying it was. Not my much, of course, but it must be nice for a GT-R owner to know they're getting what they're paying for. The 70bhp difference between 2007 and 2012 is also a lesson in not buying a car as soon as it comes out...

Anyway, enjoy this little interview. If you have trouble understanding Japanese accents (which, by the way, makes you racist :-P), then Mizuno-san has been subtitled. There's a nice little joke about it at the end.

Friday 13 January 2012

SPIED: Lexus LFA Roadster?


Before we begin, I'd like to point out that the same site where I found this also has a video of the Ferrari Codename F152 prototype I reported on a couple of days ago.

Is it a custom job? Is it a surprise unveiling of a new special edition? Who knows. Not even Carscoop, who hosted the video originally, can shed any real light on it, but what can definitely be said is that this video contains a fully-functional Lexus LFA Roadster. 47 seconds into the video above, it appears sideways, barking a glorious bark out of those three exhausts, proving that whatever it is, the 1LR-GUE 4.8-litre V10 is present and correct. Lovely. It was spied at a D1GP start-up event (D1 is the premier drifting series in the home of drifting), gliding into view after a Toyota AE86 finishes teaching its new grandson a few tricks.

It wouldn't be unusual for a convertible version of the LFA to be made officially by Toyo-- I mean, er, Lexus. When Alfa Romeo made the 500-unit 8C Competizione, its popularity lead them to produce a Spyder version, again with 500 cars. The same is true of the almost-a-Gallardo Audi R8 GT, as well as the actually-a-Gallardo Lamborghini LP570-4 Superleggera, although they had the decency of renaming that one, to Performante. So, as I say, it wouldn't be unusual. But, Lexus put so much money and effort into each one of their 500 LFA supercars (including 50 Nürburgring Editions) that they actually don't make any money on any of them, so one could argue, why do it if it won't make money? I daresay Alfa, Audi and Lamborghini did make money, so the situation is a little different. On the third hand, wherever that is, Volkswa-- I mean, er, Bugatti actually post a loss on each Veyron they make, and they made tons of limited editions, including a convertible. One commenter on Jalopnik reckons the simple fixed rollover bar means it's a one-off custom job and not a production model.

It's like a Japanese version of Outrun
Tricky to decipher indeed. Carscoop pledge to inform us of any developments in this story, so I will endeavour to pass them on. There are also photos from the event here.

Edit (14/1): After running the Japanese site above through Google Translate, it says that the car was "converted to open-top", so I'm pretty sure it's just a one-off. Given the attention to detail in this car, a simple roof chop and fixed basket-handle rollbar wouldn't make sense as something Toyota/Lexus would do with this special car of theirs.

Supercar Buyers Are Stupid

See that silver thing? You can't have one any more...
In late November, the Ferrari California was updated with a bit more power and a bit less weight, adding 30bhp and shedding 30kg. That all seems fine, but with the refresh came sad news: The California is no longer available with a manual transmission. While only a tiny fraction of Californias sold came with a clutch pedal, and a manual doesn't necessarily make sense in a more relaxed open-top GT, this now means that no Ferraris at all are available new with a manual gearbox. Earlier last year, Lamborghini waved goodbye to three-pedal motoring as well, when the limited run of 2-Wheel-Drive Gallardo Balbonis finished, saying the replacement would be paddle-shift only. This is a bad thing.

Of course, the new trend for Double-Clutch Transmissions (DCT) allows cars like the Nissan GT-R and the Ferrari 458 Italia to shift in mere milliseconds with no interruption of power at all, and the subsequent ability to accelerate like a tube train (only faster) is all very exciting, as I found out in the GT-R. Flicking it into Auto mode also allows for better fuel economy, we're told. But there's one thing missing from flappy-paddle gearboxes: driver involvement. I've also driven a Lamborghini Murciélago, an early 6.2 with a manual gearbox. Like the picture above, that had an open shift gate, where instead of a synthetic leather "boot", you just get a metal stick with a ball on the end and a metal plate to show you where to put it. When I pressed the awkward clutch (all the controls are awkward in a big Lamborghini) and went from 3rd to 4th on a straight, the metallic click-clack sounded like a rifle bolt, and it felt very satisfying to use. My own car (like the vast majority of small cars in the UK) is also a manual, and I have next to no experience with one-footed motoring. I'm fine with that. I hope that's true for decades to come.

However, I think there's a different reason from milliseconds and MPGs for supercars swallowing their gear sticks so you can't find them. It's not a good reason, either. It's because a lot of people who buy supercars are lazy. A lot of people who buy supercars are poseurs. "Ooh, it's like an F1 car, innit". It's not though, it's a road car. Always will be. I can understand the purpose of a DCT (or Lamborghini's Independent Shift Rod (ISR) system that smooths out a lighter single-clutch system) on a race track, because it's faster, it gives you less to think about and it's easier to be more consistent, particularly on a drag strip, but most supercar owners don't go to a race track, and on the road having a manual gearbox is just better. You have more control, you feel more involved and it heightens the driving experience that extra little bit. There's something so pure about it compared to a paddle/button-shift semi-auto...

That doesn't matter to people like this guy, though, leaning down and using his soft, un-worked hands to grab onto the first Aventador in his country of Saudi Arabia. His grandfather is valued at $1.2bn, although who's in the grandfather-buying business, I don't know. Either way, that means he can have any car he wants, and indeed he does. Bugatti, Koenigsegg, Porsche, Bentley, Rolls-Royce, it's all there in the highest spec possible. He is 22 and has never worked a day in his life. I can feel you hating him already (to make it worse, he exists). I do too. He doesn't go looking for twisting country lanes, because there aren't any. He lives in a desert full of shiny things sitting on flat sand. There's only one race track in Saudi Arabia (that I've found on the internet), and I bet he's never taken it here. He'll just run around at 30mph and pose at the lights, occasionally poking the throttle to please YouTube. People such as him, and people with enough fake tan to resemble him, are the ones who buy supercars like this. They want luxury, not a thrilling drive. As a result, more than 90% of most "prestige cars" are sold with non-manual transmissions, and they are slowly being rubbed out.

It may sound like puristic moaning, and in many cases when you find rants about this subject on the intertubes, it is indeed MGB owners with pipes and beards who probably also hate ABS and fuel injection. But it is sad that the driver is being yet further removed from the driving experience. I can't help but think that while I was happy clicking the shift paddles on the GT-R (which have a satisfying sturdiness to them that means they don't feel plasticky) out on the TopGear-style airfield track, if I were to be lucky enough to buy one and drive it everyday, it would feel like something's missing, and then I would feel sad. I'm not going to say that Nissan should've given the R35 a third pedal though - while the Skylines of old had one, a DCT fits the new GT-R's character a lot better in my opinion, as it's a technological tour de force and interrupting all that computer wizardry with a manual shift wouldn't be quite the same, and would remove the surging, train-like acceleration - but the problem is that the Lamborghini you see above is built like a GT-R, and so will the Gallardo replacement be as well. Lamborghinis shouldn't be designed to be like GT-Rs, they should be designed like Lamborghinis. They should be fierce and scary and, arguably, a bit awkward to use like the Murciélago. Ferrucio founded the car company to show Enzo how it was done, not Kazutoshi Mizuno (against whom I have nothing).

Would you like some car with your overhang?
And so we come back to Ferrari. I love the 458 Italia. I love its looks. I love its raw sound from the 4.5-litre V8 that gave it its numeral name. I love how fast it goes and how well it handles in video games. Deep down though, because I'm a child of the '90s, I want an F355, ideally either a GTS in Giallo Modena (pictured) or a Rosso Corsa-painted Berlinetta like everyone else wants, and without the clumsy, slow-witted F1 transmission (the first paddle-shift 'box in a road car, essentially a robotised manual transmission). It's just so pretty! Every body panel has 'pretty' written on it somewhere in invisible ink that only your brain and not your eyes can see. Aside from the slightly excessive front overhang (which is caused by them pushing the front axle as far back as possible to add agility, something the Aventador does too), I would even go as far as to say it looks perfect. It still sounds great, it apparently was as close to perfect on the move as it is standing still, and after the lacklustre 348, it brought back the passionate, non-crap Ferrari we know and love today, and knew and loved in the '60s and '70s, when they were making 250 GTs and Daytonas. One could also argue that since the 355 left us in 1999, there wasn't another truly beautiful Ferrari until the 458 came along in 2010. Sure, its 380 horsepower is made embarrassing by the Italia's 562bhp, and is bettered these days by an Audi saloon, but as Chris Harris points out, fun is more important than speed in the real world. Getting back to the point though, it came with the same shimmering symbol of all that is good as the one you can see sitting proudly inside a 550 Maranello atop this rant. It looks good, it feels and sounds good to use, but most of all it's a symbol of petrol-headedness. Man and machine working together to provide thrills in a way impossible to provide using methods other than motoring. It's a driver's tool.

I leave you with this remark from Mr. Richard Hammond, from a little-known car show we have in the UK called TopGear (you may have heard of it): "The manual gearbox [in the Lamborghini Gallardo Balboni] feels like I'm shaking hands with an old friend."

You can't shake hands with a button.

Thursday 12 January 2012

2012 Detroit Auto Show Highlights

This colour is called 'Gotta Have It Green'. Have I? Have I really? I prefer the blue, myself
The first major motor show of the year is the North American International Auto Show (NAIAS), which has just finished. It was relatively quiet in terms of exciting new models compared to Frankfurt '11, but there was plenty of new American metal looking to finally take on the Europeans at mainstream cars with at least some level of genuine conviction... because deep down, they're all secretly European. In no particular order, here are ten cars I actually took an interest in.

1. Ford Fusion/Mondeo

The Ford Fusion has been America's equivalent of the trusty Mondeo for years now, so with their first global Focus and Fiesta doing pretty well, they have decided to do the smart thing and merge them to create this. It's based on the current European Mondeo, but thoroughly refreshed inside and out, with a new range of engines and styling derived from the Evos Concept, sans the mad doors, and while the lack of "Kinetic Design" makes it a little less striking than the outgoing EU Mondeo, and the Aston Martin grille is misleading, overall it looks pretty solid, and pretty handsome. So for us, it's a thorough refresh of what's now a 5-year-old car, but over in America it's a huge leap forward over the outgoing Fusion, which is nice for them, because they don't get all the cool stuff we do in Europe. Actually, it's nice wherever you are, because the hybrid version - WAIT, don't fall asleep just yet - is claimed to be the most efficient car in the world (aside from the Nissan Leaf EV, which for many is still unjustifiable), with a 2.0-litre four-cylinder engine and a battery pack teaming up to help the Ford Fusion "Energi" achieve a claimed 100 MPGe (an equivalent of regular MPG for hybrid and electric cars), which only trails the Leaf by 6MPGe. Not bad. This means you can have a nice car that's greener than a Toyota Prius. Really not bad. It will continue to be sold outside of America as the Mondeo.


2. Acura NSX Concept

This is a car that I was genuinely nervous about. I'm a huge fan of the Honda NSX, as you can read here, and over the years there have been a few attempts to bring back the cult Japanese supercar, with varying levels of  similarity to the original. The first one, the HSC of November '03, was what I wanted, a modernisation of the NSX, still an MR-layout car with a V6, with a more respectable 300+ horsepower and gorgeous bodywork. It could've been like a Japanese Lotus Evora. Alas, it never came to be. Then, in 2007, Acura, Honda's American luxury brand (like Lexus to Toyota) brought along a front-engined V10 car called the ASCC (perhaps to tackle the Lexus LF-A Concept), which was ugly as sin and all wrong as an NSX replacement. That car was axed when the credit crunch/recession/global economic crisis/worldwide money booboo hit in late '07 and '08 (which also saw Honda pull out of Formula 1 and kill off the brilliant S2000, as they focused on making cars that sold in larger numbers), only for the ASCC to return in 2010 as the HSV-010 GT, racing in the Japanese SUPER GT series and winning the title on its first attempt, which was impressive.

And so here we are, in 2012, with this new attempt, and this time, they appear to be serious. First of all, they haven't called it HSC or ASCC or MRSC, they've used those letters, NSX. Secondly, a one-off roadster version will appear in The Avengers with Robert Downey Jr.'s Tony Stark behind the wheel, suggesting it'll evolve into something with a price tag. Thirdly, they already have a plan of attack: the car you see here will be designed, developed and built in Ohio, which is in America, which is definitely not in Japan. That worries me a little, seeing as Japan is making the Lexus LFA, Nissan GT-R and Toyota GT86 at the moment, and are surely perfectly poised now to make a truly brilliant Honda NSX. Of course, with the economy still in a poor state, we'll have to wait and see if they actually go through with it this time...

But what if they do? What can we expect? Well, From every angle except the front, it's absolutely gorgeous, as you can see above. The front fascia though, I would change. To what exactly, I'm not 100% sure, but that beaky Acura grille has to go, and the low-set headlights, while pretty, are a little too Audi R8. Whilst it looks great overall, it doesn't look Japanese. I won't harp on about this much, but if the idea is that Acura will make this car themselves and design it to look like an Acura supercar and not a Honda, then don't call it the NSX. The NSX is one of the best-known Japanese supercars, and this looks American. Call it the ARX or something. Any other letters will do (well, except GTR, they would get in more trouble for that). When Lexus made a supercar, they didn't call it the Lexus Supra just because they could, they gave it its own identity and called it the LFA. Whatever, either way it's going to have a mid-mounted 3.5-litre V6 (good) and a hybrid system (not good) similar to Peugeot-Citroën's Hybrid4 system, except back-to-front, with engine-powered rear wheels and battery-powered front wheels with regenerative braking, that will feature torque-vectoring to keep the front end pointed in the right direction and keeping your racing line on GT5 nice and tight. It will also have a DCT with paddles behind the steering wheel. Not the kind of thing Ayrton Senna would develop if he were alive, but there's promise in this car. If only they hadn't called an automatic hybrid an NSX...


3. Dodge Dart

Another new mainstream entry from America, to replace the miserable Dodge Neon, is this, the new Dodge Dart, a car so American it's actually Italian. Based on the Alfa Romeo Giulietta (because Fiat can make good small cars and Chrysler cannot), the Dart features three very similar engines. There's a 2.0-litre four-pot engine with 160bhp and 145 lb/ft that appears to be Chrysler's creation, then there's the clever turbocharged 1.4-litre Fiat MultiAir engine, producing the same 160bhp as the 2.0, but 40lb/ft more torque, which begs the question, as the MultiAir will be cheaper to insure and more efficient, what's the point in buying the bigger 2.0-litre engine if the smaller turbocharged one is technically better in every way? The top-shelf engine to go in the R/T version is a combination of the two companies' engineering, as the 2.4-litre (non-turbo) four-cylinder engine is the same "Tigershark" engine design as the 2.0-litre, but with Fiat's new MultiAir 2 valve timing system. It makes more power, at 184bhp, but the torque is in-between the other two engines, at 171lb/ft. Weird. Whichever engine you choose though, it will be propelling an Italian-American with a noticeably more upmarket interior than previous small American 'sedans', putting the Chrysler Neon and Dodge Caliber to shame. It's promising, but I'm reserving judgement until I read reviews suggesting it's worth considering over a Ford Focus. 6-speed manual transmissions are available on all versions, with the 1.4T also offering a 6-speed DCT from Fiat, and the other two engines offering a 6-speed auto from Chrysler. Hey, I made it all the way through this paragraph without doing a Mafia accent! I wasn't expecting that...


4. Falcon F7

I wasn't expecting this either. If the Acura NSX made me nervous because of my high expectations for it, this car is making me nervous for entirely different reasons - have you ever seen a more menacing face? This cartoonishly angry mug belongs to a new American supercar, because with Saleen, SSC Supercars, SLC, Hennessey, the Corvette ZR1 and Dodge Viper ACR, there just weren't enough American supercars. This one is called the Falcon F7, and from any other angle you would think someone had a Ferrari fetish, a Pontiac Fiero and some spare time. Weighing in at around 1200kg, thanks to a simple aluminium tube frame and carbon fibre, the F7 is powered by a mid-mounted small block Chevy engine making over 600 horsepower, which gets it from 0-60 in around 3.5 seconds and onto a top speed of around 200mph. When you think about it, those numbers are pretty ordinary in the supercar world. A Nissan GT-R will do 0-60 in 2.8 seconds, a Lamborghini Aventador has 700 horsepower and a Pagani Huayra will do 230mph. Mind you, the F7 is, of course, much cheaper than the latter two cars, with a possible price ranging from $195,000 - $250,000. That makes it either more or less expensive than a Ferrari 458 Italia (with a 0-60 of 3.3 and a top speed of 202mph), and if it's more, then it won't be worth it. It may look like a Ferrari, but it won't drive or feel like one.


5. BMW 3-Series (F30)

This isn't actually the world début of the new BMW 3-Series, but I think it's the first motor show it's appeared at, and I have reported on spy shots of this car, so consider this a follow-up. The new F30 generation (replacing the E90) is bigger and lighter, faster and more economical, and only comes with turbocharged engines, for much the same reason that the base 2.0 engine in the Dodge Dart above is pointless. Together, turbocharging and Direct Injection really are the replacement for displacement. Thankfully though, you can still get it with a Straight-Six engine, a rarity these days, particularly in mainstream cars. In fact, outside of BMW, I can't think of another company that still uses the in-line configuration for six-pot engines. One of the I6s has been replaced with a four-cylinder engine, but they still had to make the engine bay long enough to accept a V12 for the 335i and its 3.0-litre turbo six. Because it's a bigger car than before, let's also assume it's wide enough for a V12. Now let's pretend that they're going to merge two 335i engines together to make a 6.0 V12 BiTurbo with 612bhp... now there's an M3.

6. Lexus LF-LC

Lexus. Proprietors of beautifully well-made boredom. Who wants the sportiness and image of German cars? Not Lexus owners. They may or may not approve of this LF-LC concept, but then this isn't about them, this is about Lexus building up its own image. Looking like a fantasy LFA, this is only a styling exercise, meant to suggest the kind of thing they might do if they were ever to replace the ugly and boring SC430 that was killed off much later than it really should've been (see more pictures here). Of course, being a modern Toyota product that isn't the LFA or GT 86, it's a hybrid. Beyond that, though, Lexus didn't mention anything about the powertrain, because that's not really the point of this car. This won't get built, it's just a styling exercise hinting at the future. The LF-LC has done what it set out to achieve though, as it has won Lexus a design award at this very motor show in Detroit. Job done. Now build an SC that looks like this. Then use the platform to make a Toyota Supra. Hybrid powertrain not acceptable.


7. Smart ForUs

Somehow, Smart is still alive. It pops up every now and again with a tiny eco-conscious concept car featuring rounded-off squares in the design, and then disappears off to sell what must be a low amount of ForTwo city cars. In a world of Fiat 500 TwinAirs and Toyota iQs, why bother? To keep itself from thinking these thoughts, Smart has busied itself with this, the ForUs Concept. The name could be taken in a number of ways - Smart may consider it clever by their own standards, it could mean they've built it for themselves, it could mean it's another wretched "lifestyle vehicle", or it could mean that it's the Smart For US. The latter idea has some weight, because the ForUs is designed to challenge the humongous American pickup trucks in every way (except practicality). Is bigger really better? Do cowboys in southern states really use their pickups and fill their load beds to the brim? If not, then get ready to revel in the Suzuki X90-meets-rounded-squares looks, electric powertrain (of course) and a whopping thirty-five inch rear cargo area, complete with trendy lifestyle bicycles. Presumably, the bikes are there for when the 75hp electric motor with 96lb/ft of torque runs the batteries clean out in the middle of nowhere. This 3.5-metre "utility vehicle" will never see production, unless Smart plan on culling the population by causing Americans to die laughing.


8. Cadillac ATS

This almost got its own article here on SBV8, but now it won't. You see, Cadillac reckons it's built a 3-Series. Now, American cars are to luxury vehicles what Korean cars are to normal vehicles. But Korean cars are on the up and up - the Kia GT from Frankfurt last year was gorgeous, and Hyundai/Kia is making some genuinely good cars now - so that also makes it time for the Americans to step it up. Thus, the ATS you see here (which got a terrible amount of hype from Jalopnik's head honcho) has many modern features on it, such as an in-house infotainment system, multi-link fully independent suspension all round, magnetic dampers (or magnetorheological dampers if you're a scientist/mega nerd), four-channel independent ABS, Brembo brakes and optional All-Wheel-Drive. That's all very well, but where it starts to actually get interesting is that is has a 50:50 weight distribution and a weight favourably comparable to the BMW you see above. That means there's a good chance of it driving well. Spy shots of it at the Nürburgring suggest the ride might be a little firm, but then so's a BMW on RunFlat tyres. Like the Dodge Dart, there's a pointless naturally-aspirated 4-cylinder engine and a smaller turbocharged one (2.0 litres) that's better on paper than the NA 2.5. The range-topping 3.6-litre V6 is estimated to produce around 320bhp, which is not exactly sluggish. As for aesthetics, I'm not really sure about it myself. Cadillac's rulers-only styling has lovers and haters, but I think the headlights are out of proportion with the huge grille. The rest just sort of looks like a Cadillac.

Technically though, this could potentially be a genuine alternative to the German "Großer Drei", at the very least providing stiff competition to Lexus and Infiniti (Nissan's luxury brand), and SAAB if Cadillac's parents hadn't killed them off... The real test for this car now will be finding out how well it all comes together, how good the interior quality is (a key point when fighting Audi and Lexus, the kings of interiors), and seeing how it fares in the various group tests that will be held in magazines the world over. Reserve judgement until then, I say.


9. Hyundai Veloster Turbo

Back in the day - and by "the day" I mean "the eighties" - all you needed to have on the back of your car to get petrolheads all aflutter was a "TURBO" badge. Mitsubishi went a little overboard with this idea on the Starion Turbo (also known as the Dodge Conquest TURBO), but all the same, from Renault to Porsche, any '80s car worth its salt had those five magic letters on the back. Now, Hyundai's partying like it's 1986 with the Veloster Turbo. Of course, the impression you may get having read this far down the page is that almost every car is turbocharged these days, but this car is different, because while many use metal hair dryers for economy, to replace big, thirsty engines, Hyundai have applied one here in the good name of POWERRRRR. 45% more power, in fact. While the normal Veloster produces a paltry 138bhp and 123lb/ft from its naturally-aspirated 1.6-litre engine, the new turbo-aspirated car you see here in matte grey with a hefty bodykit is forcing out 201bhp and 195lb/ft through the front wheels, which is much more like it for the supposed VW Scirocco rival. You can control these Turbo-tastic horses with a 6-speed manual gearbox, or ignore them with a 6-speed automatic. Weight has risen from 1172kg to 1270kg, which is not great, but if it's because they've been toughening up the chassis and suspension to make it handle better, then it's not all bad. Of course, it could just be weighed down with loads of TURBO badges and the mortar cannons they're calling exhausts. Either way, that still makes it lighter than a VW Golf GTI, so it's not heavy, per sé, just heavier. Comparison of stats here.

In modern hot hatches, 200+ horsepower through the front wheels not the understeery hell it sounds like; Renaultsport will sell you the Clio 200, widely believed to be the best-handling hot hatch in the world right now, as well as a 265bhp Mégane Trophy, which is the fastest Front-Wheel-Drive car around the fearsome Nürburgring. Ford even went as far as channelling 345 horses through the front of the Focus RS500, and that went down pretty well, despite some torque steer. All this means the Hyundai Veloster TURBO has the potential to be a real hoon machine, one that retains its USP of having one door on the driver's side and two doors on the passenger side, making it either a 4-door hot hatch or a 3-door coupé, however you see it.


10. Toyota NS4 Concept

Don't worry, you're nearly there now. You just have to make it through this paragraph about a 4-door Toyota. I wouldn't normally include stuff like this NS4 Concept, because concept cars like this are a dime a dozen. It's hybrid-powered (although like the LF-LC, there's no detail beyond that), looks kinda futuristic and boasts about some pie-in-the-sky interface that, because this is post-2010, includes social networking in some way. In case you don't know these concepts exist though, here's proof. It looks fairly reasonable, with the sleek, banana-shaped roof profile of a Mercedes-Benz CLS, VW Passat CC, Audi A5 Sportback, Audi A7 Sportback, Aston Martin Rapide, and so on and so forth, although the front is a little weird. According to Toyota, "NS4 demonstrates Toyota's take on the human connection to the car, with technology that considers both emotional and rational relationships, person-to-car and car-to-society." Eugh. It does this with glass more transparent to radio waves, presumably boosting signal so you can communicate how bad the traffic is from behind the wheel on Twitter a little quicker, and by replacing the dashboard with a kind of giant iPad that controls all the car's functions. Called the Human-Machine Interface - eugh - it can even learn your habits and predict what you will do next in certain situations, kind of like how Google Chrome auto-completes frequently typed searches and addresses, or like when you go to the same pub and say "I'll have the usual". Sort of. On top of that, it has all the latest safety acronyms, like PCS, ADB, BSM and THUMS. There's more here if you're trying to vomit, but right now I'm losing the will to live just typing about it...


The Also-Rans
Honourable mentions include:

Porsche 911 (991) Cabriolet - Pretty self-explanatory, this one.

Ford Shelby Mustang GT500 Super Snake 50th Anniversary - Longest combination of awesome words in a car name meets highest amount of power in a front-engined car ever, thanks to the supercharged 5.0 V8 making a staggering 800 horsepower. Hear that? It's the sound of tyres quivering in fear.

Subaru BRZ - Scooby's twin of the Toyota GT 86 features a different front bumper and slightly more forgiving suspension settings. They actually claim to have done all the mechanical bits on both cars, which is largely true actually, aside from Toyota's direct injection system.

VW E-Bugster Concept - Chop-top VW New-New Beetle powered by a 114bhp electric motor, which is in the back, just like a real Beetle used to do it. Only this one's actually as green as hippies want it to be.

Chevrolet Code 130R and Tru 140S Concepts - These are meant to appeal to people approaching 30 years old, but they're certainly not catching on. The red Code 130R is far too bland and the silver Tru 140S is just another "youthful" blobby concept car, which is again instantly forgettable. Move on, Chevrolet.

Mercedes-Benz SL-Class - While the new SL's meant to be very clever with its aluminium chassis and such, it just looks like a really big SLK. Wait for the AMG version, I reckon. That'll be cool.

And that's it! You've made it to the bottom of the page. Sorry this was quite long, but the NSX made me rant a bit. The Geneva round-up in March might be split into halves, seeing as that's usually the show where it all happens. We'll have to see though.